You are not currently logged in.
Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Scientific Misconduct and Editorial and Peer Review Processes
Mary Frank Fox
The Journal of Higher Education
Vol. 65, No. 3, Special Issue: Perspectives on Research Misconduct (May - Jun., 1994), pp. 298-309
Published by: Ohio State University Press
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2943969
Page Count: 12
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
This article analyzes the roles of editors and peer reviewers in detecting and sanctioning scientific misconduct, the structural problems inherent in the process, and the best means of enabling peer and editorial roles in correction of misconduct. It argues that the review process can play a part in response to misconduct but that its corrective role is limited.
The Journal of Higher Education © 1994 Ohio State University Press