Access

You are not currently logged in.

Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:

login

Log in through your institution.

If You Use a Screen Reader

This content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Journal Article

Scientific Misconduct and Editorial and Peer Review Processes

Mary Frank Fox
The Journal of Higher Education
Vol. 65, No. 3, Special Issue: Perspectives on Research Misconduct (May - Jun., 1994), pp. 298-309
Published by: Taylor & Francis, Ltd.
DOI: 10.2307/2943969
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2943969
Page Count: 12
Were these topics helpful?
See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!

Select the topics that are inaccurate.

Cancel
  • Read Online (Free)
  • Download ($24.95)
  • Subscribe ($19.50)
  • Add to My Lists
  • Cite this Item
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Scientific Misconduct and Editorial and Peer Review Processes
Preview not available

Abstract

This article analyzes the roles of editors and peer reviewers in detecting and sanctioning scientific misconduct, the structural problems inherent in the process, and the best means of enabling peer and editorial roles in correction of misconduct. It argues that the review process can play a part in response to misconduct but that its corrective role is limited.

Page Thumbnails

  • Thumbnail: Page 
[298]
    [298]
  • Thumbnail: Page 
299
    299
  • Thumbnail: Page 
300
    300
  • Thumbnail: Page 
301
    301
  • Thumbnail: Page 
302
    302
  • Thumbnail: Page 
303
    303
  • Thumbnail: Page 
304
    304
  • Thumbnail: Page 
305
    305
  • Thumbnail: Page 
306
    306
  • Thumbnail: Page 
307
    307
  • Thumbnail: Page 
308
    308
  • Thumbnail: Page 
309
    309