You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Comparison Of Infrared Coagulation And Rubber Band Ligation For First And Second Degree Haemorrhoids: A Randomised Prospective Clinical Trial
John L. Templeton, R. A. J. Spence, T. L. Kennedy, T. G. Parks, G. Mackenzie and W. A. Hanna
British Medical Journal (Clinical Research Edition)
Vol. 286, No. 6375 (Apr. 30, 1983), pp. 1387-1389
Published by: BMJ
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/29510715
Page Count: 3
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Rubber bands, Ligation, Coagulation, Side effects, Clinical trials, Patient compliance, Pain, Health outcomes, Surgeons, Bleeding
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
One hundred and thirty seven previously untreated out-patients with first and second degree haemorrhoids were allocated at random to treatment by infrared coagulation (n=66) or rubber band ligation (n=71). Complete follow up was obtained in 122 patients (60 who had undergone infrared coagulation (group 1), and 62 rubber band ligation (group 2)) at periods from three months to one year after completion of treatment. Infrared coagulation produced a satisfactory outcome in 51 patients (85%): 34 were rendered asymptomatic and 17 improved. Rubber band ligation produced a satisfactory outcome in 57 patients (92%): 33 were rendered asymptomatic and 24 improved. Both methods were equally effective in first and second degree haemorrhoids. The incidence of side effects, particularly discomfort, during and after treatment was significantly higher in those treated by rubber band ligation (p<0.001). This appeared to be an appreciable deterrent to future patient compliance. The number of patients losing more than 24 hours from work was higher after rubber band ligation than after infrared coagulation. The number of treatments necessary to cure symptoms did not differ significantly between the two methods. Infrared coagulation was significantly faster than rubber band ligation (p<0.001). Infrared coagulation is a simple, fast, and effective outpatient method for the treatment of first and second degree haemorrhoids with fewer troublesome side effects and higher patient acceptability than rubber band ligation.
British Medical Journal (Clinical Research Edition) © 1983 BMJ