You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
ANGLO-AMERICAN FICTION THEORY 1947-1972
Studies in the Novel
Vol. 8, No. 2 (summer 1976), pp. 199-209
Published by: The Johns Hopkins University Press
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/29531784
Page Count: 11
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Although the development of recent theories of the novel has been strongly shaped by modernist poetics, certain reactions have produced divergencies—moving on the one hand toward Life as the criterion, and on the other toward broadening the formal base—in the attempt to do more justice to the novel as a form different from the lyric. During 1947-51 the Jamesian criteria of objectivity and consistency were fully established, and yet Bentley and Blackmur could question such extreme formalism. Frye and R. S. Crane developed ways of defining differing forms closer to the larger structures of fiction. Studies of point of view, time, subjectivity, etc. burgeoned during 1952-59, and controversy raged among such critics as Rahv and Stallman over Symbolism vs. Realism. During 1959-72 Lodge stood firmly on the old poetic ground, Booth produced a full-scale attack on Jamesian norms, while others argued either in favor of Life or of a pluralism of forms. The issue of open-endedness came to the fore during 1966-72, and with it an emphasis upon radical experimentation. Modernist poetics is still with us, then, but it has been enlarged by other approaches, and perhaps it is time for varied means-end theories vs. a single standard. Bibliographical notes. (NF)
Studies in the Novel © 1976 The Johns Hopkins University Press