You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Inside the U.S. Supreme Court: The Reliability of the Justices' Conference Records
Forrest Maltzman and Paul J. Wahlbeck
The Journal of Politics
Vol. 58, No. 2 (May, 1996), pp. 528-539
Published by: The University of Chicago Press on behalf of the Southern Political Science Association
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2960238
Page Count: 12
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Voting, Supreme Court justices, Academic conferences, Chief justice, Statistics, Meetings, Personal documents, Writ of certiorari, Null hypothesis
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Judicial scholars are making increased use of data from the justices' personal papers. In the face of comments by justices questioning the reliability of this information and, perhaps, skepticism among judicial scholars about the reliability of some justices' records, it is important to explore the reliability of data drawn from their papers. To do so, we examine the conference records for the 1967 and 1968 terms of the Supreme Court. For these years, the papers of four justices, Earl Warren, William Douglas, William Brennan, and Thurgood Marshall, are available at the Library of Congress. We found that their records are substantially accurate and reliable. A logit model of conference recording error finds that mistakes are not simply random noise, but can be explained as a function of case complexity, the length of joint service with the voting justices, tentative conference positions, and Court consensus.
The Journal of Politics © 1996 The University of Chicago Press