You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Collected And Neglected: Are Oxford Hostels For The Homeless Filling Up With Disabled Psychiatric Patients?
BMJ: British Medical Journal
Vol. 299, No. 6701 (Sep. 16, 1989), pp. 706-709
Published by: BMJ
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/29705350
Page Count: 4
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Hostels, Deviant behavior, Psychological symptoms, Disabilities, Brief psychiatric rating scale, Psychiatric services, Psychometrics, Rating scales, Psychosocial rehabilitation, Psychiatric hospitals
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Objective—To assess the severity of psychiatric symptoms among residents of hostels for homeless people. Design—Survey of residents in two hostels in Oxford, comprising three weeks of background fieldwork, a demographic questionnaire, and rating behaviour over two weeks with a behavioural rating scale (REHAB) and mental state with the brief psychiatric rating scale. Setting—Two hostels for homeless people in Oxford Subjects—146 Medium to long term residents, of whom 48 were selected by hostel workers by the following criteria: continuous residence for at least two months, signs of persistent severe mental disability, and difficulty in coping independently in the community. Two subjects died during the study; three (previously long term psychiatric inpatients) declined to be assessed on the psychiatric scale. Main outcome measure—Behavioural disturbance and mental state. Results—Only a third of the total sample had been born in Oxfordshire. Subjects had been accepted into the hostel either by arrangement with the local psychiatric service (22) or straight off the streets (26); 43 had had a previous (non-drug related) psychiatric admission. Subjects were significantly more likely than other residents to have spent longer (>80 weeks) in a hostel in the past three years (p<0.02). With reference to norms for deviant behaviour, the 46 subjects assessed showed considerable deviant behaviour (average weekly scores: 0 (11 subjects), 1 (14), 2-3 (16), and ≥4 (5)) not significantly different from that expected in moderately to severely handicapped psychiatric inpatients (ϰ²=1.3, df=3, p>0.7); 22 had scores equivalent to those in most severely handicapped inpatients. Of the 43 subjects assessed with the psychiatric rating scale, 16 had symptoms of neurosis, 29 of florid psychosis, and 32 of a deficit state. Symptoms of deficit state were positively correlated with ratings of low social activity on the behavioural scale (Spearman's rank correlation coefficient 0.30, p=0.03). Conclusions—Hostels are having to care for long term severely affected psychiatric patients discharged into the community. The suitability of the services offered to such subjected should be assessed.
BMJ: British Medical Journal © 1989 BMJ