You are not currently logged in.
Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:
Why Economists Dislike a Lump of Labor
Review of Social Economy
Vol. 65, No. 3 (SEPTEMBER 2007), pp. 279-291
Published by: Taylor & Francis, Ltd.
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/29770416
Page Count: 13
Preview not available
The lump-of-labor fallacy has been called one of the "best known fallacies in economics." It is widely cited in disparagement of policies for reducing the standard hours of work, yet the authenticity of the fallacy claim is questionable, and explanations of it are inconsistent and contradictory. This article discusses recent occurrences of the fallacy claim and investigates anomalies in the claim and its history. S.J. Chapman's coherent and formerly highly regarded thery of the hours of labor is reviewed, and it is shown how that theory could lend credence to the job-creating potentiality of shorter working time policies. It concludes that substituting a dubious fallacy claim for an authentic economic theory may have obstructed fruitful dialogue about working time and the appropriate policies for regulating it.
Review of Social Economy © 2007 Taylor & Francis, Ltd.