You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Exact Unconditional Sample Sizes for the 2 × 2 Binomial Trial
Samy Suissa and Jonathan J. Shuster
Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General)
Vol. 148, No. 4 (1985), pp. 317-327
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2981892
Page Count: 11
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Sample size, Significance level, Binomials, Statistical variance, Statism, Proportions, Critical values, Power functions, Approximation, Statistical estimation
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Exact attained significance level and sample size methods are developed for use with the unconditional Z statistic in the 2 × 2 contingency table from two independent binomial samples of equal size. The resulting sample sizes tend to be smaller than those required by tables for the exact conditional test. Moreover, the proposed exact Z test is uniformly more powerful than the exact conditional test for α = 0.01, 0.025 and 0.05, and common sample size n = 10(1)150, the only combinations of α and n considered herein. These methods therefore provide an exact approach to unconditional tests which, in contrast to the conditional ones, are easily explained to and understood by non-statisticians. This paper is the first for which sample size calculations are made based on exact unconditional tests for any situation in which no ancillary statistic exists for the nuisance parameter.
Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General) © 1985 Royal Statistical Society