You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Ethics and the Expert Witness: Statistics on Trial
Stephen E. Fienberg
Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (Statistics in Society)
Vol. 160, No. 2 (1997), pp. 321-331
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2983223
Page Count: 11
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Trials, Litigation, Ethical codes, Games, Professional ethics, Statism, Coroners, Legal evidence, Forensic evidence, Statistics
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
When a statistician appears as an expert witness at trial, most judges and juries expect the expert witness to be a true expert. Yet the adversarial rules of the common law legal system often make it difficult for statisticians to proceed in a manner similar to that which they encounter in academic settings. The situation is exacerbated in a battle of expert statistical witnesses before the court. As a consequence, it is the statistical profession that is often on trial, not simply a defendant. This paper is, at least in part, about the seduction that occurs when a statistician becomes an expert witness at trial and how the statistician can attempt to protect against the most pernicious aspects of the game associated with the use of expert witnesses in the adversarial process.
Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (Statistics in Society) © 1997 Royal Statistical Society