You are not currently logged in.
Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Statistical Methods and Scientific Induction
Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological)
Vol. 17, No. 1 (1955), pp. 69-78
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2983785
Page Count: 10
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
The attempt to reinterpret the common tests of significance used in scientific research as though they constituted some kind of acceptance procedure and led to "decisions" in Wald's sense, originated in several misapprehensions and has led, apparently, to several more. The three phrases examined here, with a view to elucidating the fallacies they embody, are: (i) "Repeated sampling from the same population", (ii) Errors of the "second kind", (iii) "Inductive behaviour". Mathematicians without personal contact with the Natural Sciences have often been misled by such phrases. The errors to which they lead are not always only numerical.
Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological) © 1955 Royal Statistical Society