You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Economic and Referendum Voting and the Problem of Data Choice: A Reply
Lonna Rae Atkeson and Randall W. Partin
American Journal of Political Science
Vol. 42, No. 3 (Jul., 1998), pp. 1003-1007
Published by: Midwest Political Science Association
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2991739
Page Count: 5
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Voting, Polls, Upper houses, Referendums, Economic models, Economic conditions, Standard error
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Previously (Atkeson and Partin 1995), we proposed and found evidence that federalism permeates vote choice in subpresidential elections, making gubernatorial candidates subject to state-level forces and making senatorial candidates subject to national-level forces. Carsey and Wright, in replicating and cross-validating our earlier analyses, raise some valid concerns. While we remain confident in our original argument and conclusions, we join with Carsey and Wright in concluding that choice and quality of data are far more critical problems than many of us recognize.
American Journal of Political Science © 1998 Midwest Political Science Association