You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
The Value of Committee Seats in the United States Senate, 1947-91
Charles Stewart, III and Tim Groseclose
American Journal of Political Science
Vol. 43, No. 3 (Jul., 1999), pp. 963-973
Published by: Midwest Political Science Association
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2991842
Page Count: 11
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Applying a method we introduced in an earlier paper and applied to the House (Groseclose and Stewart, 1998a), we estimate the value of U.S. Senate committees from the 81st to 102nd Congress. This method is superior to prior committee-ranking methods and is particularly appropriate for ranking Senate committees. The rankings we produce conform to the distinction between important and less important committees that have been maintained in the Senate rules and reinforced through the operation of the "Johnson Rule." High-ranking committees tend to be those that senators associate with prestige and policy pursuits; low-ranking committees have reputations for a constituency orientation. After producing a rank-ordering of Senate committees for the post-war era, we examine whether the committee rankings have changed over time and whether Republicans and Democrats reveal different preference-orderings for committees.
American Journal of Political Science © 1999 Midwest Political Science Association