You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Performance Characteristics of Seven Nutrition Label Formats
Alan S. Levy, Sara B. Fein and Raymond E. Schucker
Journal of Public Policy & Marketing
Vol. 15, No. 1, Nutrition and Health (Spring, 1996), pp. 1-15
Published by: American Marketing Association
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/30000331
Page Count: 15
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
The authors evaluate seven nutrition label formats to determine consumer comprehension and acceptance of displayed information. They test comprehension on five tasks: comparing two products, judging healthfulness, verifying claims, estimating servings needed to meet the daily requirement for a nutrient, and balancing nutrients in a daily diet. Performance scores were higher on some tasks—particularly dietary management ones—for formats that displayed nutrient amounts in percentages than for those that displayed nutrient amounts in metric units, even when interpretational aids were included on the metric formats. The two most preferred formats were metric formats with an interpretational aid. The findings have an important impact on decisions about the final nutrition label format required by the Food and Drug Administration.
Journal of Public Policy & Marketing © 1996 American Marketing Association