You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Distributive Justice, Catholic Social Teaching, and the Moral Responsibility of Marketers
Gene R. Laczniak
Journal of Public Policy & Marketing
Vol. 18, No. 1, Pricing and Public Policy (Spring, 1999), pp. 125-129
Published by: American Marketing Association
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/30000515
Page Count: 5
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Catholicism, Marketing, Financial management, Business ethics, Social ethics, Ethical instruction, Ethical consumerism, Morality, Corporations, Economic systems
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
This commentary uses as its platform an essay by Karpatkin (1999) titled "Toward a Fair and Just Marketplace for All Consumers: The Responsibilities of Marketing Professionals." This article supports Karpatkin's position that, too often, large corporations are willing to exploit weak and vulnerable consumers as the means to unsavory financial gain. Vulnerable groups include the poor, children, and the disadvantaged elderly. Essentially, Karpatkin raises questions about the lack of distributive justice for these consumer segments in the marketplace. In answer to this, the author presents a religion-inspired business ethics. Using a body of writing sometimes called Catholic Social Teaching (CST), the author describes and discusses a set offour guiding ethical principles. At the foundation of CST is the principle of human dignity. Building on this base, the author explores three additional principles: stewardship, preferential option for the vulnerable, and worker dignity. Together, these principles provide a "blended" moral theory that outlines a rationale for giving economically or socially disadvantaged consumer segments distinct and special moral treatment in the marketplace.
Journal of Public Policy & Marketing © 1999 American Marketing Association