You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Trends in Types of Research Reported in Selected Social Work Journals, 1956-65
Roslyn Weinberger and Tony Tripodi
Social Service Review
Vol. 43, No. 4 (Dec., 1969), pp. 439-447
Published by: The University of Chicago Press
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/30021473
Page Count: 9
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Social work, Research studies, Research methods, Research design, Social services, Scientific method, Observational studies, Content analysis, Observational research, Depth interviews
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
The authors' purpose was to describe trends regarding the amount and type of research studies reported in selected social work journals over the time span 1956-65. A content analysis was made of all the articles in the social work journals. Those articles reporting empirical research or discussing research topics were chosen and classified within the au- thors' typology. The typology, in which categories were defined according to purposes and methods of research, was presented in detail with definitions and examples. The data were used to describe changes in two five-year periods of research reporting. Some con- clusions were: the number and percentage of research articles increased over time; more studies were concerned with hypothesis testing; and there was more of an emphasis on reports of empirical research, with fewer articles devoted to speculation about research.
Social Service Review © 1969 The University of Chicago Press