You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
Superiority of MacConkey's Agar over Salmonella-Shigella Agar for Isolation of Shigella dysenteriae Type 1
M. Mujibur Rahaman, Imdadul Huq and Chitta Ranjan Dey
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
Vol. 131, No. 6 (Jun., 1975), pp. 700-703
Published by: Oxford University Press
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/30061752
Page Count: 4
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Shigella, Dysentery, Bacillus, Pathogens, Shigella dysenteriae, Research and development laboratories, Diarrhea, Epidemics, Cholera, Diseases
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Preview not available
The efficiency of MacConkey's agar in the isolation of various types of Shigella was compared with that of salmonella-shigella (SS) agar during an extensive 18-month outbreak of disease caused by Shigella. In all, 1,580 isolates of Shigella were obtained from 12,307 rectal swab and fecal samples of patients with diarrhea and their contacts by direct plating onto MacConkey's and SS agars. Shigella dysenteriae type 1 and Shigella flexneri constituted 55% and 33% of all isolates, respectively, with a smaller number of Shigella boydii and Shigella sonnei. MacConkey's agar was superior to SS agar in the detection of S. dysenteriae type 1; 83% of the isolates were detectable on MacConkey's agar, compared with 40% on SS agar. In contrast, 84% of S. flexneri isolates were detectable on SS agar, compared with 51% on MacConkey's agar alone. These findings confirm that, for the culture of fecal specimens thought to contain S. dysenteriae type 1, one of the media used should be noninhibitory. Shigella was isolated at a consistently and significantly higher rate from fecal samples than from rectal swabs.
The Journal of Infectious Diseases © 1975 Oxford University Press