You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
The Diphtheria and Pertussis Components of Diphtheria-Tetanus Toxoids-Pertussis Vaccine Should Be Genetically Inactivated Mutant Toxins
John B. Bobbins, Rachel Schneerson, Birger Trollfors, Hiroko Sato, Yuji Sato, Rino Rappuoli and Jerry M. Keith
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
Vol. 191, No. 1 (Jan. 1, 2005), pp. 81-88
Published by: Oxford University Press
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/30076895
Page Count: 8
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Whooping cough, Vaccination, Toxins, Diphtheria, Antibodies, Diptheria pertussis tetanus vaccine, Antigens, Infants, Children, Child development
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Preview not available
Replacement of cellular with acellular pertussis (aP) vaccines has considerably reduced the systemic reactions observed with diphtheria-tetanus toxoids-pertussis vaccine but has not eliminated the extensive swelling (sometimes involving an entire limb) observed after the fifth injection of diphtheria-tetanus toxoids-aP (DTaP) vaccine. This local reaction, which is likely an Arthus hypersensitivity reaction caused by high levels of antibodies reacting with DTaP vaccine, could discourage its use in adults, who serve as the major reservoir of pertussis for infants. That a critical level of antibodies to pertussis toxin is both essential and sufficient to prevent infection with Bordetella pertussis is derived from data from animal and clinical studies, including data showing the similarities between the immunity induced by diphtheria and pertussis toxoids. The genetically inactivated diphtheria and pertussis mutant toxins are more immunogenic and, therefore, induce comparable levels of antitoxin at lower protein levels than do the formalin-treated native toxins. Replacement of the diphtheria and aP components with these improved antigens will reduce the amount of protein in DTaP vaccine and, most likely, the incidence and severity of local reactions in teenagers and adults.
The Journal of Infectious Diseases © 2005 Oxford University Press