Access

You are not currently logged in.

Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:

login

Log in to your personal account or through your institution.

If You Use a Screen Reader

This content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.

Conflicting Evidence in a Bayesian Synthesis of Surveillance Data to Estimate Human Immunodeficiency Virus Prevalence

A. M. Presanis, D. De Angelis, D. J. Spiegelhalter, S. Seaman, A. Goubar and A. E. Ades
Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (Statistics in Society)
Vol. 171, No. 4 (Oct., 2008), pp. 915-937
Published by: Wiley for the Royal Statistical Society
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/30130787
Page Count: 23
  • Read Online (Free)
  • Download ($29.00)
  • Subscribe ($19.50)
  • Cite this Item
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Conflicting Evidence in a Bayesian Synthesis of Surveillance Data to Estimate Human Immunodeficiency Virus Prevalence
Preview not available

Abstract

Inferential approaches based on the synthesis of diverse sources of evidence are increasingly employed in epidemiology as a means of exploiting all available information, perhaps from studies of differing designs. The application of the synthesis of evidence to real world problems generally leads to the formulation of probability models which are highly complex and for which there is a clear need for a well-defined iterative process of model criticism. This process should include an appraisal of model fit and the detection of inconsistent or conflicting evidence. The latter is especially relevant as, typically, multiple sources of data provide information on the same parameter. Detected conflicts need then to be resolved. We present a case-study of the detection and resolution of conflicting evidence, using as an illustration the estimation of the prevalence of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection in England and Wales. We employ a Bayesian model to synthesize routine surveillance and survey data. The population aged 15-44 years is divided into mutually exclusive exposure groups. In each group g, we simultaneously estimate the proportion of the total population belonging to the group (ρg), the proportion of individuals infected with HIV (πg) and the proportion of HIV positive individuals who are diagnosed (δg). The total number of HIV infections, both diagnosed and undiagnosed, is then estimated as a function of the parameters ρg, πg, and δg. Model fit is assessed by examining the posterior mean deviance. Identification of the data items to which the model exhibits a lack of fit leads to the detection of conflicting evidence, one example of which is a conflict between census data and survey data over the size of the female Sub-Saharan African born population. This conflict arises from a naive interpretation of the representativeness of the survey data and is resolved by using two approaches: exclusion of data and expansion of the model to accommodate the bias.

Page Thumbnails

  • Thumbnail: Page 
[915]
    [915]
  • Thumbnail: Page 
916
    916
  • Thumbnail: Page 
917
    917
  • Thumbnail: Page 
918
    918
  • Thumbnail: Page 
919
    919
  • Thumbnail: Page 
920
    920
  • Thumbnail: Page 
921
    921
  • Thumbnail: Page 
922
    922
  • Thumbnail: Page 
923
    923
  • Thumbnail: Page 
924
    924
  • Thumbnail: Page 
925
    925
  • Thumbnail: Page 
926
    926
  • Thumbnail: Page 
927
    927
  • Thumbnail: Page 
928
    928
  • Thumbnail: Page 
929
    929
  • Thumbnail: Page 
930
    930
  • Thumbnail: Page 
931
    931
  • Thumbnail: Page 
932
    932
  • Thumbnail: Page 
933
    933
  • Thumbnail: Page 
934
    934
  • Thumbnail: Page 
935
    935
  • Thumbnail: Page 
936
    936
  • Thumbnail: Page 
937
    937