You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Activity of Disinfectants against Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus faecium
Guillermo Saurina, David Landman and John M. Quale
Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology
Vol. 18, No. 5 (May, 1997), pp. 345-347
Published by: Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/30141230
Page Count: 3
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Antiseptics, Quaternary ammonium compounds, Hypochlorite, Chlorides, Sodium, Peroxides, Alcohols, Hydrogen, Enterococcus faecium, Cleaning
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) often contaminate the hospital environment We examined the activity of commonly used disinfectants against eight strains of VRE, using a quantitative suspension test method. Isopropyl alcohol and sodium hypochlorite were highly effective. Hydrogen peroxide was ineffective for all strains. After 10 minutes of incubation (the manufacturers' recommended time of exposure), three phenolic and three quaternary ammonium compounds also were highly effective. After 3 minutes of exposure, however, occasional failures did occur. With the exception of 3% hydrogen peroxide, most disinfectants appear to be active against VRE.
Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology © 1997 Cambridge University Press