You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Use of Indwelling Urinary Tract Catheters in Swedish Hospitals
Lars G. Burman, Birgitta Fryklund and Bertil Nyström
Vol. 8, No. 12 (Dec., 1987), pp. 507-511
Published by: Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/30143955
Page Count: 5
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Surgical specialties, Hospital units, Catheters, Gynecology, Catheterization, Internal medicine, Infections, Urinary tract infections, Infection control, Mortality
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
In a survey of 67,774 patient days in 27 Swedish acute care hospitals, an indwelling urinary tract catheter (IUTC) was in place during 12% of patient days. There were marked differences between services (from 2% in rheumatology to 49% in urology), but also between hospitals for the same type of service (general surgery, internal medicine, gynecology, orthopaedic surgery) concerning proportion IUTC days, average duration of catheterization and the indications for IUTC use. The great local variation in IUTC usage for a particular service was usually not correlated with type of hospital (district, county, or regional/teaching), ie, with the mix of patients studied. We propose that the results mainly reflect a variable local impact of infection control and that a much more restrictive use of IUTCs is possible in many wards. This condition would imply a considerable potential for reducing the incidences of urinary tract infection and bacteremia and thus, mortality among hospitalized patients in Sweden.
Infection Control © 1987 Cambridge University Press