You are not currently logged in.
Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Locomotion in Lions: Energetic Cost and Maximum Aerobic Capacity
Pamela Sue Chassin, C. Richard Taylor, Norman C. Heglund and Howard J. Seeherman
Vol. 49, No. 1 (Jan., 1976), pp. 1-10
Published by: The University of Chicago Press. Sponsored by the Division of Comparative Physiology and Biochemistry, Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/30155672
Page Count: 10
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
The purpose of this study was to find out whether or not the lions' reliance on social hunting is correlated with physiological constraints which limit their speed and endurance. Oxygen consumption of two young male lions was measured as a function of running speed, first when they weighed 28-35 kg and again after they had approximately doubled their weight (50-57 kg). Oxygen consumption increased linearly with speed between 2.0 and 8.5 km·h⁻¹, but at a rate more than three times the rate predicted for quadrupedal mammals. There was no difference between the weight-specific oxygen consumption of the lions as they doubled their weight. The observed slope for the relationship between oxygen consumption and speed was 0.36 ml O₂ (g·km)⁻¹ versus a predicted value of 0.11 ml O₂ (g·km)⁻¹. The observed y-intercept was -0.09 ml O₂ (g·h)⁻¹ versus a predicted value of 0.39 ml O₂ (g·h)⁻¹. The lions' maximum aerobic capacity appeared to be about 3 ml O₂ (g·h)⁻¹, a value about 13 times their predicted resting rate. This was reached at low speeds where the lions traveled at a slow trot because oxygen consumption increased so rapidly with increasing speed. The same maximum value was obtained on a level and on an inclined treadmill. Lions change from a trot to a gallop at a lower stride frequency than would be predicted. We are not able to account for the lions' unusually high energy cost for locomotion. Neither their limb morphology nor their immaturity offers a likely explanation. Our results help explain the lions' reliance on social hunting on physiological grounds.
Physiological Zoology © 1976 The University of Chicago Press