You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Attention Capture and Transfer in Advertising: Brand, Pictorial, and Text-Size Effects
Rik Pieters and Michel Wedel
Journal of Marketing
Vol. 68, No. 2 (Apr., 2004), pp. 36-50
Published by: American Marketing Association
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/30161988
Page Count: 15
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Brands, Advertising campaigns, Advertising research, Marketing, Magazines, Eye tracking data, Attention, Visual fixation, Consumer advertising, Advertising
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
The three key ad elements (brand, pictorial, and text) each have unique superiority effects on attention to advertisements, which are on par with many commonly held ideas in marketing practice. This is the main conclusion of an analysis of 1363 print advertisements tested with infrared eye-tracking methodology on more than 3600 consumers. The pictorial is superior in capturing attention, independent of its size. The text element best captures attention in direct proportion to its surface size. The brand element most effectively transfers attention to the other elements. Only increments in the text element's surface size produce a net gain in attention to the advertisement as a whole. The authors discuss how their findings can be used to render more effective decisions in advertising.
Journal of Marketing © 2004 American Marketing Association