You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
The Impact of Cobranding on Customer Evaluation of Brand Counterextensions
Journal of Marketing
Vol. 69, No. 3 (Jul., 2005), pp. 1-18
Published by: American Marketing Association
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/30162053
Page Count: 18
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Brands, Bugles, Customers, Marketing, Perceptual similarity, Mathematical independent variables, Parents, Slogans, Psychological assessment, Perception tests
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
A brand that successfully extends from its parent category into a new extension category often faces a counter-extension by a brand from the extension category back into its own parent category. However, there is little guidance available on how brand extension strategies should be adjusted to mitigate the risk to the parent brand from counterextensions. This research examines the differential impact of cobranded versus solo-branded extensions on customer evaluations of brand counterextensions. It demonstrates that customers evaluate a counterextension less favorably if the preceding extension by the focal brand is cobranded than if it is solo branded. The findings suggest that cobranding not only improves the attribute profile of a brand's own extension but also helps protect the brand against counterextensions.
Journal of Marketing © 2005 American Marketing Association