You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
The Augmented Latent Class Model: Incorporating Additional Heterogeneity in the Latent Class Model for Panel Data
Sajeev Varki and Pradeep K. Chintagunta
Journal of Marketing Research
Vol. 41, No. 2 (May, 2004), pp. 226-233
Published by: American Marketing Association
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/30162329
Page Count: 8
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Lower of cost or market principle, Modeling, Marketing, Brands, Ketchup, Peanut butters, Datasets, Statistical estimation, Prices, Parametric models
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Marketing researchers have actively sought to account for the heterogeneity in households' preferences and responses to marketing-mix elements (e.g., price, promotion) when analyzing scanner-panel data. This is because not doing so biases response coefficient estimates that can potentially alter the conclusions drawn from such analyses. In this article, the authors present an extension to the latent class model (LCM) that accounts for additional heterogeneity by allowing households' preferences to be a continuous mixture of segment-level preferences. The authors show how their model generalizes the LCM by the mere addition of S + 1 parameters, where S refers to the number of segments. Because a limitation of the traditional LCM is that it does not adequately account for heterogeneity in responses across households, the authors' model mitigates this criticism leveled at the LCM. They then compare their model with the traditional LCM and the equivalent continuous mixture (random-effects) models in terms of model selection criteria and predictive ability. The results indicate that the authors' model outperforms both the LCM and the equivalent random-effects (logit) model on these criteria.
Journal of Marketing Research © 2004 American Marketing Association