You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
American Confrontations with Reception Theory
Robert C. Holub
Vol. 81, No. 2 (Summer, 1989), pp. 213-225
Published by: University of Wisconsin Press
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/30166229
Page Count: 13
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Reader response theory, Literary criticism, Textual criticism, Literary theory, Determinacy, Political revolutions, Sensory perception, Transcendentals, Theoretical linguistics, Linguistics
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Although reception theory has become better known in the United States during the past decade, it has not managed to influence the critical scene in any significant manner. This situation is due only in part to philosophical underpinnings that are unfamiliar to critics in the United States. The central reason for the failure of reception theory to gain a large audience is the perception that it is not radical enough. Fish's review of Iser's The Act of Reading, de Man's introduction to an English volume of essays by Jauß, and Weber's analysis of contradictions in Iser's theory demonstrate in exemplary fashion this response to reception theory in the United States. American critics employ various common strategies to make their theoretical works appear more radical, but their putatively more sophisticated criticism is ultimately mired in negativity and self-cancellation.
Monatshefte © 1989 University of Wisconsin Press