You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
Contributory Fault and Rape Convictions: Loglinear Models for Blaming the Victim
M. D. Pugh
Social Psychology Quarterly
Vol. 46, No. 3 (Sep., 1983), pp. 233-242
Published by: American Sociological Association
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3033794
Page Count: 10
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Rape, Guilty verdicts, Jurors, Attribution theory, Social psychology, Defendants, Sexual assault, Men, Social stigma, Moral character
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Preview not available
The practice of revealing the past sexual conduct of rape victims in court trials was the issue which prompted this study. The primary objective was to model the effects of juror sex, victim stigma, and contributory fault on rape convictions using simulation data from 358 undergraduates. Contrary to certain previous studies, loglinear analysis indicates that information about a rape victim's past sexual conduct does affect perceptions of her moral character and judgments of guilt. But the explanation for those effects may be far more complicated than previously supposed. Attribution theory confounds three distinct questions in the decision-making process and is unrealistically mute with respect to the potential influence of culturally patterned expectations.
Social Psychology Quarterly © 1983 American Sociological Association