You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
Assessing Comparability of Measurement in Cross-National Research: Authoritarian-Conservatism in Different Sociocultural Settings
Joanne Miller, Kazimierz M. Slomczynski and Ronald J. Schoenberg
Social Psychology Quarterly
Vol. 44, No. 3 (Sep., 1981), pp. 178-191
Published by: American Sociological Association
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3033832
Page Count: 14
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Social psychology, Factor analysis, Statistical models, Conservatism, Psychometrics, Statistical significance, Correlations, Countries, Personality psychology, Author indexing
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Preview not available
This paper explores various analytic criteria for assessing comparability of measurement in cross-national survey research. The analysis focuses on the construct validity of items thought to capture authoritarian-conservatism in the United States and Poland. Although we may assume that set of attitudes designed to measure the construct can be under varying circumstances, what can be identified as an authoritarian world view may, in fact, depend upon the particular sociocultural setting of the observation. We examine the validity of the indicators within each country, identifying which indicators are common to both countries and which are nation-specific. Then, using confirmatory factor analysis, we test whether there is sufficient structural similarity in the pattern of responses to establish conceptual equivalence.
Social Psychology Quarterly © 1981 American Sociological Association