Access

You are not currently logged in.

Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:

login

Log in to your personal account or through your institution.

Hydrologic Connectivity and the Management of Biological Reserves: A Global Perspective

Catherine M. Pringle
Ecological Applications
Vol. 11, No. 4 (Aug., 2001), pp. 981-998
Published by: Wiley
DOI: 10.2307/3061006
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3061006
Page Count: 18
  • Download ($42.00)
  • Subscribe ($19.50)
  • Cite this Item
Hydrologic Connectivity and the Management of Biological Reserves: A Global Perspective
Preview not available

Abstract

Increasingly, biological reserves throughout the world are threatened by cumulative alterations in hydrologic connectivity within the greater landscape. Hydrologic connectivity is used here in an ecological sense to refer to water-mediated transfer of matter, energy, and/or organisms within or between elements of the hydrologic cycle. Obvious human influences that alter this property include dams, associated flow regulation, groundwater extraction, and water diversion, all of which can result in a cascade of events in both aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems. Even disturbances well outside the boundaries of reserves can have profound effects on the biological integrity of these "protected" areas. Factors such as nutrient and toxic pollution and the spread of nonnative species are perpetuated by hydrologic connectivity, and their effects can be exacerbated by changes in this property. Hydrological alterations are now affecting reserves through increasingly broad feedback loops, ranging from overdrawn aquifers to atmospheric deposition and global climate change. Such alterations are often beyond the direct control of managers because they lie outside reserve boundaries, and data on hydrologic connection between reserves and surrounding landscapes are scant. The subject of water has also been typically excluded from the literature pertaining to both theoretical and practical aspects of reserve size, isolation, and design. This results, in part, from early management strategies developed when the landscape matrix outside of reserves was not excessively fragmented, and when awareness of hydrologic connectivity was in its infancy. The location of a given reserve within a watershed, relative to regional aquifers and wind and precipitation patterns, can play a key role in its response to human disturbance transmitted through the hydrologic cycle. To illustrate this point, I discuss reserves of varying sizes from diverse regions throughout the world. Reserves located in middle and lower watersheds often suffer direct hydrologic alterations that cause severe habitat modification and exacerbate the effects of pollution. In contrast, reserves in upper watersheds may have intact physical habitat and contain important source populations of some native biota, yet hydrologic disturbances in lower watersheds may cause extirpation of migratory species, cascading trophic effects, and genetic isolation. Worldwide, <7% of land area is either strictly or partially protected, and many reserves are in danger of becoming population "sinks" for wildlife if we do not develop a more predictive understanding of how they are affected by hydrologic alterations that originate outside of their boundaries.

Page Thumbnails

  • Thumbnail: Page 
981
    981
  • Thumbnail: Page 
982
    982
  • Thumbnail: Page 
983
    983
  • Thumbnail: Page 
984
    984
  • Thumbnail: Page 
985
    985
  • Thumbnail: Page 
986
    986
  • Thumbnail: Page 
987
    987
  • Thumbnail: Page 
988
    988
  • Thumbnail: Page 
989
    989
  • Thumbnail: Page 
990
    990
  • Thumbnail: Page 
991
    991
  • Thumbnail: Page 
992
    992
  • Thumbnail: Page 
993
    993
  • Thumbnail: Page 
994
    994
  • Thumbnail: Page 
995
    995
  • Thumbnail: Page 
996
    996
  • Thumbnail: Page 
997
    997
  • Thumbnail: Page 
998
    998