You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Lateral Sensitivity Modulation Explains the Flanker Effect in Contrast Discrimination
Chien-Chung Chen and Christopher W. Tyler
Proceedings: Biological Sciences
Vol. 268, No. 1466 (Mar. 7, 2001), pp. 509-516
Published by: Royal Society
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3068220
Page Count: 8
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Modeling, Signals, Luminance, Linear transformations, Visual cortex, Observational research, Social interaction models, Parametric models, Psychophysics, Crossovers
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
We used a dual-masking paradigm to study how contrast discrimination can be influenced by the presence of adjacent stimuli. The task of the observer was to detect a target superimposed on a pedestal in the presence of flankers. The flankers (i) reduce the target threshold at zero pedestal contrast, (ii) shift the target threshold versus pedestal contrast (TvC) function horizontally to the left on a log-log plot at high pedestal contrasts, and (iii) reduce the size of pedestal facilitation at low pedestal contrasts. The horizontal shift at high pedestal contrasts suggests that the flanker effect is a multiplicative factor that cannot be explained by previous models of contrast discrimination. We extend the divisive inhibition model of contrast discrimination by implementing the flanker effect as a lateral multiplicative sensitivity modulation. This extended model provides a good account of the data.
Proceedings: Biological Sciences © 2001 Royal Society