You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Two-Level Proportional Hazards Models
Jerry J. Maples, Susan A. Murphy and William G. Axinn
Vol. 58, No. 4 (Dec., 2002), pp. 754-763
Published by: International Biometric Society
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3068517
Page Count: 10
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Simulations, Standard error, Statistical models, Multilevel models, Formal education, Censorship, Birth control, Modeling, Womens education, Neighborhood schools
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
We extend the proportional hazards model to a two-level model with a random intercept term and random coefficients. The parameters in the multilevel model are estimated by a combination of EM and Newton-Raphson algorithms. Even for samples of 50 groups, this method produces estimators of the fixed effects coefficients that are approximately unbiased and normally distributed. Two different methods, observed information and profile likelihood information, will be used to estimate the standard errors. This work is motivated by the goal of understanding the determinants of contraceptive use among Nepalese women in the Chitwan Valley Family Study (Axinn, Barber, and Ghimire, 1997). We utilize a two-level hazard model to examine how education and access to education for children covary with the initiation of permanent contraceptive use.
Biometrics © 2002 International Biometric Society