You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
A Note on Estimating Crude Odds Ratios in Case-Control Studies with Differentially Misclassified Exposure
Robert H. Lyles
Vol. 58, No. 4 (Dec., 2002), pp. 1034-1037
Published by: International Biometric Society
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3068549
Page Count: 4
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Maximum likelihood estimation, Estimators, Statistical estimation, Biometrics, Epidemiology, Case control studies, Parameterization, Biostatistics, Computer software, Statistical variance
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Morrissey and Spiegelman (1999, Biometrics 55, 338-344) provided a comparative study of adjustment methods for exposure misclassification in case-control studies equipped with an internal validation sample. In addition to the maximum likelihood (ML) approach, they considered two intuitive procedures based on proposals in the literature. Despite appealing ease of computation associated with the latter two methods, efficiency calculations suggested that ML was often to be recommended for the analyst with access to a numerical routine to facilitate it. Here, a reparameterization of the likelihood reveals that one of the intuitive approaches, the inverse matrix method, is in fact ML under differential misclassification. This correction is intended to alert readers to the existence of a simple closed-form ML estimator for the odds ratio in this setting so that they may avoid assuming that a commercially inaccessible optimization routine must be sought to implement ML.
Biometrics © 2002 International Biometric Society