Access

You are not currently logged in.

Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:

login

Log in to your personal account or through your institution.

Palatability of Marine Macro-Holoplankton: Nematocysts, Nutritional Quality, and Chemistry as Defenses against Consumers

Stephan G. Bullard and Mark E. Hay
Limnology and Oceanography
Vol. 47, No. 5 (Sep., 2002), pp. 1456-1467
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3068964
Page Count: 12
  • More info
  • Cite this Item
Palatability of Marine Macro-Holoplankton: Nematocysts, Nutritional Quality, and Chemistry as Defenses against Consumers
Preview not available

Abstract

Chemical defenses against consumers have been hypothesized to be common among marine macro-holoplankton, but few studies have assessed macro-holoplankton susceptibility to predators or the traits affecting palatability. We used generalist fishes to determine the palatability of fresh tissues, freeze-dried homogenates, and chemical extracts from 19 species of macro-holoplankton. Fishes rejected fresh tissues of all the cnidarians, ctenophores, and cyanobacteria we examined but consumed salp and chaetognath tissues. In contrast, fishes consumed homogenates and chemical extracts of all macro-holoplankton except for the cyanobacterium Trichodesmium sp. We examined nematocysts and low nutritional quality as mechanisms causing rejection of fresh tissues. Once nematocysts were deactivated, fishes consumed cnidarian tentacles, indicating that nematocysts served as defenses. The nutritional quality of macro-holoplankton varied almost 500-fold among species and was strongly bimodal, with most macro-holoplankton species having ≤0.7 mg soluble protein ml-1 or ≥7 mg ml-1. In laboratory assays, there was a significant positive relationship between the nutritional quality of artificial foods and their acceptability to fishes. In field assays, reef fishes avoided experimental foods that had a protein content similar to low-quality macro-holoplankton but fed rapidly on higher quality foods. Furthermore, macro-holoplankton that were high in protein content possessed defensive traits that low-protein species lacked. Although fresh tissues of most macro-holoplankton were rejected by generalist fishes, we found evidence of chemical defense only in a cyanobacterium. Thus, chemical defenses were rare among macro-holoplankton, and rejection for >90% of the species we assessed was due to nematocysts or low nutritional quality.

Page Thumbnails

  • Thumbnail: Page 
1456
    1456
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1457
    1457
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1458
    1458
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1459
    1459
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1460
    1460
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1461
    1461
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1462
    1462
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1463
    1463
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1464
    1464
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1465
    1465
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1466
    1466
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1467
    1467