Access

You are not currently logged in.

Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:

login

Log in to your personal account or through your institution.

Whole-Tree Methods for Detecting Differential Diversification Rates

Kai M. A. Chan and Brian R. Moore
Systematic Biology
Vol. 51, No. 6 (Dec., 2002), pp. 855-865
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3070820
Page Count: 11
  • Download ($42.00)
  • Cite this Item
Whole-Tree Methods for Detecting Differential Diversification Rates
Preview not available

Abstract

Prolific cladogenesis, adaptive radiation, species selection, key innovations, and mass extinctions are a few examples of biological phenomena that lead to differential diversification among lineages. Central to the study of differential diversification rates is the ability to distinguish chance variation from that which requires deterministic explanation. To detect diversification rate variation among lineages, we propose a number of methods that incorporate information on the topological distribution of species diversity from all internal nodes of a phylogenetic tree. These whole-tree methods (MΠ, MΣ, and MR) are explicitly connected to a null model of random diversification-the equal-rates Markov (ERM) random branching model-and an alternative model of differential diversification: MΠ is based on the product of individual nodal ERM probabilities; MΣ is based on the sum of individual nodal ERM probabilities, and MR is based on a transformation of ERM probabilities that corresponds to a formalized system that orders trees by their relative symmetry. These methods have been implemented in a freely available computer program, SymmeTREE, to detect clades with variable diversification rates, thereby allowing the study of biological processes correlated with and possibly causal to shifts in diversification rate. Application of these methods to several published phylogenies demonstrates their ability to contend with relatively large, incompletely resolved trees. These topology-based methods do not require estimates of relative branch lengths, which should facilitate the analysis of phylogenies, such as supertrees, for which such data are unreliable or unavailable.

Page Thumbnails

  • Thumbnail: Page 
855
    855
  • Thumbnail: Page 
856
    856
  • Thumbnail: Page 
857
    857
  • Thumbnail: Page 
858
    858
  • Thumbnail: Page 
859
    859
  • Thumbnail: Page 
860
    860
  • Thumbnail: Page 
861
    861
  • Thumbnail: Page 
[862]
    [862]
  • Thumbnail: Page 
863
    863
  • Thumbnail: Page 
864
    864
  • Thumbnail: Page 
865
    865