Access

You are not currently logged in.

Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:

login

Log in to your personal account or through your institution.

If You Use a Screen Reader

This content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.

Fertility Regulation among Women in Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire: Contraception, Abortion or Both?

Agnès Guillaume and Annabel Desgrées du Loû
International Family Planning Perspectives
Vol. 28, No. 3 (Sep., 2002), pp. 159-166
Published by: Guttmacher Institute
DOI: 10.2307/3088259
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3088259
Page Count: 8
  • Read Online (Free)
  • Download ($10.00)
  • Subscribe ($19.50)
  • Cite this Item
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Fertility Regulation among Women in Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire: Contraception, Abortion or Both?
Preview not available

Abstract

Context: In Cote d'Ivoire, where contraceptive prevalence is low, abortion is thought to play an important role in the current fertility decline. However, data on abortion, which is illegal, are scarce. Methods: A retrospective survey on abortion and contraceptive practices was conducted in 1998 among 2,400 women who attended four general health centers in Abidjan. Multinomial logistic regression was performed to analyze the independent effects of social and demographic variables on the odds that women would adopt one of three fertility regulation behaviors instead of doing nothing at all. Results: Forty percent of women reported controlling their fertility through contraceptive use alone, 30% through reliance on both contraception and abortion and 3% through abortion alone; some 27% did nothing to control fertility. Muslims had consistently lower odds than Christians of adopting any of the three behaviors instead of doing nothing (odds ratios, 0.2-0.5). Being unmarried and better educated were associated with significantly elevated odds of adopting each of the three behaviors (odds ratios, 1.4-33.8). Finally, the odds of using abortion alone were significantly higher among women younger than 25 than among those aged 25-34 (2.0). Conclusions: The relationship between abortion and contraception is highly complex. Whereas women who do not have access to contraceptives or who experience method failure often resort to abortion, abortion can also trigger subsequent reliance on contraception.

Page Thumbnails

  • Thumbnail: Page 
159
    159
  • Thumbnail: Page 
160
    160
  • Thumbnail: Page 
161
    161
  • Thumbnail: Page 
162
    162
  • Thumbnail: Page 
163
    163
  • Thumbnail: Page 
164
    164
  • Thumbnail: Page 
165
    165
  • Thumbnail: Page 
166
    166