You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
Hesitancy of Arbitrators to Accept Interest Arbitration Cases: A Test of Conventional Wisdom
I. B. Helburn and Robert C. Rodgers
Public Administration Review
Vol. 45, No. 3 (May - Jun., 1985), pp. 398-402
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3109967
Page Count: 5
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Arbitration, Police, Public sector, Grief, Fire fighting, Employee relations, Scheduling, Employment, Alternative dispute resolution, Public administration
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Preview not available
Literature suggests a "conventional wisdom" that arbitrators generally are reluctant to accept interest arbitration cases. We examined factors which influenced the acceptance of such cases by experienced arbitrators. Of 285 members of the National Academy of Arbitrators who responded to our survey, 72 percent said that they would hear interest cases, time permitting. Twenty-two percent said that they would "sometimes" hear such cases, while only 6 percent indicated that they refused to hear interest cases. The decision to accept such cases was systematically related to arbitrators' knowledge of union, management and other arbitration panel members to be involved, to single-arbitrator or tripartite arbitration and last-offer or traditional arbitration, and to the type and number of issues involved.
Public Administration Review © 1985 American Society for Public Administration