You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Back to Kant: Reinterpreting the Democratic Peace as a Macrohistorical Learning Process
The American Political Science Review
Vol. 95, No. 1 (Mar., 2001), pp. 15-31
Published by: American Political Science Association
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3117626
Page Count: 17
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Dyadic relations, Democracy, Kantianism, Peacetime, World wars, Cold wars, Liberalism, Dialectic, Dyadics
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
The contemporary international relations literature links the democratic peace hypothesis to Kant's famous peace plan. Yet, whether attempting to prove or disprove the hypothesis, most quantitative studies have lost sight of important dimensions of the Kantian vision. I reinterpret the democratic peace as a dynamic and dialectical learning process. In order to assess the dynamic dimension of this process (while controlling for exogenous dialectical reversals), I rely on quantitative evidence drawn from popular data sets. In conformance with the Kantian perspective, the conflict propensities among democracies exhibit a steadily falling trend since the nineteenth century. Yet, in partial opposition to Kant's expectations, other dyads also experience a significant, although weaker, pacifying trend. A series of tests shows that these findings are robust to epochal effects, various control variables, and "maturity effects" measuring the age of democratic dyads.
The American Political Science Review © 2001 American Political Science Association