You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Modular Organization of Internal Models of Tools in the Human Cerebellum
Hiroshi Imamizu, Tomoe Kuroda, Satoru Miyauchi, Toshinori Yoshioka and Mitsuo Kawato
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
Vol. 100, No. 9 (Apr. 29, 2003), pp. 5461-5466
Published by: National Academy of Sciences
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3139734
Page Count: 6
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Velocity, Cerebellum, Magnetic resonance imaging, Cognitive models, Modularity, Colors, Behavioral neuroscience, Modeling, Learning, Anatomy
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Preview not available
Human capabilities in dexterously manipulating many different tools suggest modular neural organization at functional levels, but anatomical modularity underlying the capabilities has yet to be demonstrated. Although modularity in phylogenetically older parts of the cerebellum is well known, comparable modularity in the lateral cerebellum for cognitive functions remains unknown. We investigated these issues by functional MRI (fMRI) based on our previous findings of a cerebellar internal model of a tool. After subjects intensively learned to manipulate two novel tools (the rotated mouse whose cursor appeared at a rotated position, and the velocity mouse whose cursor velocity was proportional to the mouse position), they could easily switch between the two. The lateral and posterior cerebellar activities for the two different tools were spatially segregated, and their overlaps were <10%, even at low statistical thresholds. Activities of the rotated mouse were more anterior and lateral than the velocity mouse activities. These results were consistent with predictions by the MOdular Selection And Identification Controller (MOSAIC) model that multiple internal models compete to partition sensory-motor experiences and their outputs are linearly combined for a particular context.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America © 2003 National Academy of Sciences