You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
The Cost-Effectiveness of Conservation Payments
Paul J. Ferraro and R. David Simpson
Vol. 78, No. 3 (Aug., 2002), pp. 339-353
Published by: University of Wisconsin Press
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3146894
Page Count: 15
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Forest conservation, Environmental conservation, Subsidies, Biodiversity conservation, Economic capital, Habitat conservation, Apiculture, Prices, Rain forests, Ecosystems
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
International donors invest billions of dollars to conserve ecosystems in low-income nations. The most common investments aim to encourage commercial activities, such as ecotourism, that indirectly generate ecosystem protection as a joint product. We demonstrate that paying for ecosystem protection directly can be far more cost-effective. Although direct-payment initiatives have imposing institutional requirements, we argue that all conservation initiatives face similar challenges. Thus conservation practitioners would be well advised to implement the first-best direct-payment approach, rather than a second-best policy option. An empirical example illustrates the spectacular cost savings that can be realized by direct-payment initiatives.
Land Economics © 2002 Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System