You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Implementing the Safe Minimum Standard Approach: Two Case Studies from the U.S. Endangered Species Act
Robert P. Berrens, David S. Brookshire, Michael McKee and Christian Schmidt
Vol. 74, No. 2 (May, 1998), pp. 147-161
Published by: University of Wisconsin Press
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3147047
Page Count: 15
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Habitat conservation, Endangered Species Act, Riverine habitats, Species, Sustainable agriculture, Endangered species, Rivers, Wildlife habitats, Ecological sustainability, Economic impact analysis
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
In situations characterized by true uncertainty and potential irreversibility, the safe minimum standard (SMS) approach is a decision rule to protect some critical natural resource-unless the social costs of doing so are somehow "intolerable." The SMS has been discussed widely, but actual case studies remain rare. We present two case studies, focusing on endangered fishes in the Colorado and Virgin River systems, demonstrating that the legal framework of the U.S. Endangered Species Act (ESA) is consistent with the SMS. The case studies incorporate the results from applied general equilibrium modeling and provide an avenue for investigating excessive economic consequences.
Land Economics © 1998 Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System