You are not currently logged in.
Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Minimal Haplotype Tagging
Paola Sebastiani, Ross Lazarus, Scott T. Weiss, Louis M. Kunkel, Isaac S. Kohane and Marco F. Ramoni
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
Vol. 100, No. 17 (Aug. 19, 2003), pp. 9900-9905
Published by: National Academy of Sciences
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3147634
Page Count: 6
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
The high frequency of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the human genome presents an unparalleled opportunity to track down the genetic basis of common diseases. At the same time, the sheer number of SNPs also makes unfeasible genomewide disease association studies. The haplotypic nature of the human genome, however, lends itself to the selection of a parsimonious set of SNPs, called haplotype tagging SNPs (htSNPs), able to distinguish the haplotypic variations in a population. Current approaches rely on statistical analysis of transmission rates to identify htSNPs. In contrast to these approximate methods, this contribution describes an exact, analytical, and lossless method, called BEST (Best Enumeration of SNP Tags), able to identify the minimum set of SNPs tagging an arbitrary set of haplotypes from either pedigree or independent samples. Our results confirm that a small proportion of SNPs is sufficient to capture the haplotypic variations in a population and that this proportion decreases exponentially as the haplotype length increases. We used BEST to tag the haplotypes of 105 genes in an African-American and a European-American sample. An interesting finding of this analysis is that the vast majority (95%) of the htSNPs in the European-American sample is a subset of the htSNPs of the African-American sample. This result seems to provide further evidence that a severe bottleneck occurred during the founding of Europe and the conjectured "Out of Africa" event.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America © 2003 National Academy of Sciences