You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Brain Potentials Associated with Conscious Aftereffects Induced by Unseen Stimuli in a Blindsight Subject
L. Weiskrantz, A. Rao, I. Hodinott-Hill, A. C. Nobre and A. Cowey
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
Vol. 100, No. 18 (Sep. 2, 2003), pp. 10500-10505
Published by: National Academy of Sciences
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3147745
Page Count: 6
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Resultants, Afterimages, Electrodes, Electric fields, Hemispheres, Signals, Mental stimulation, Visually impaired persons, Recordings, Luminance
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
The study is of brain activity in a blindsight subject (D.B.), who reports conscious visual afterimages of stimuli of which he is unaware when they are presented. This contrast offered a unique opportunity to study event-related potential recordings of conscious versus unconscious visual phenomena generated by the very same stimulus in the identical locus of the visual field. The behavioral results confirmed the reliability of the difference in the subject's report for inducing stimuli versus their aftereffects. The rationale of the event-related potential analysis was to subtract "on" signals from "off" signals, the latter associated with the onset of conscious events and the former for events that remained unconscious. Because there are inherent differences in on and off potentials, the subtractive resultants for the blind hemifield were compared with the same subtractions for the good hemifield when the subject was aware both of the stimuli and their afterimages. A differential pattern in subtractive resultants emerged with a strong anterior left frontal focus for the blind field and a posterior focus for the intact field. The results are compared with other studies suggesting an anterior focus for conscious visual events.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America © 2003 National Academy of Sciences