You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Detecting and Explaining Vividness Effects in Attitudinal Judgments
Jolita Kisielius and Brian Sternthal
Journal of Marketing Research
Vol. 21, No. 1 (Feb., 1984), pp. 54-64
Published by: American Marketing Association
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3151792
Page Count: 11
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Judgment, Persuasion, Mental stimulation, Marketing, Instructional material evaluation, Social psychology, Memory, Consumer research, Base interest rates, Shampoo
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
A common belief among marketing practitioners is that increasing the vividness of a message enhances its persuasiveness. This belief has received support in experimental investigations, but vividness also has been found to undermine persuasion or to have no effect. The authors extend a current view of memory operation to predict when and how vividness will affect persuasion. According to this view, the favorableness of available information determines the persuasive effect of vividness. This assertion is tested and supported in a series of experiments. The findings are discussed in terms of strategies for controlling vividness effects.
Journal of Marketing Research © 1984 American Marketing Association