You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Completely Unacceptable Levels in Conjoint Analysis: A Cautionary Note
Paul E. Green, Abba M. Krieger and Pradeep Bansal
Journal of Marketing Research
Vol. 25, No. 3 (Aug., 1988), pp. 293-300
Published by: American Marketing Association
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3172532
Page Count: 8
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Modeling, Calibration, Marketing, Computer software, Tradeoffs, Consumer research, Zero, Questionnaires, Ratios, Data collection
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
An experiment is reported on the extent to which respondents adhere to the implications of choosing the "completely unacceptable" level in hybrid conjoint (and related) applications. The findings indicate that the form of the instructions matters, but that respondents often ignore the implications of previous responses when responding to full-profile options containing unacceptable attribute levels. The authors discuss the impact of this inconsistency on internal predictive validity in both empirical and theoretical terms.
Journal of Marketing Research © 1988 American Marketing Association