Access

You are not currently logged in.

Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:

login

Log in to your personal account or through your institution.

If You Use a Screen Reader

This content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.

Completely Unacceptable Levels in Conjoint Analysis: A Cautionary Note

Paul E. Green, Abba M. Krieger and Pradeep Bansal
Journal of Marketing Research
Vol. 25, No. 3 (Aug., 1988), pp. 293-300
DOI: 10.2307/3172532
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3172532
Page Count: 8
  • Read Online (Free)
  • Download ($24.00)
  • Subscribe ($19.50)
  • Cite this Item
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Completely Unacceptable Levels in Conjoint Analysis: A Cautionary Note
Preview not available

Abstract

An experiment is reported on the extent to which respondents adhere to the implications of choosing the "completely unacceptable" level in hybrid conjoint (and related) applications. The findings indicate that the form of the instructions matters, but that respondents often ignore the implications of previous responses when responding to full-profile options containing unacceptable attribute levels. The authors discuss the impact of this inconsistency on internal predictive validity in both empirical and theoretical terms.

Page Thumbnails

  • Thumbnail: Page 
293
    293
  • Thumbnail: Page 
294
    294
  • Thumbnail: Page 
295
    295
  • Thumbnail: Page 
296
    296
  • Thumbnail: Page 
297
    297
  • Thumbnail: Page 
298
    298
  • Thumbnail: Page 
299
    299
  • Thumbnail: Page 
300
    300