You are not currently logged in.
Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Setting Confidence Intervals for Bounded Parameters
Vol. 17, No. 2 (May, 2002), pp. 149-159
Published by: Institute of Mathematical Statistics
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3182816
Page Count: 11
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Setting confidence bounds is an essential part of the reporting of experimental results. Current physics experiments are often done to measure nonnegative parameters that are small and may be zero and to search for small signals in the presence of backgrounds. These are examples of experiments which offer the possibility of yielding a result, recognized a priori to be relatively improbable, of a negative estimate for a quantity known to be positive. The classical Neyman procedure for setting confidence bounds in this situation is arguably unsatisfactory and several alternatives have been recently proposed. We compare methods for setting Gaussian and Poisson confidence intervals for cases in which the parameter to be estimated is bounded. These procedures lead to substantially different intervals when a relatively improbable observation implies a parameter estimate beyond the bound.
Statistical Science © 2002 Institute of Mathematical Statistics