You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
The Labor Supply Response to (Mismeasured but) Predictable Wage Changes
The Review of Economics and Statistics
Vol. 86, No. 2 (May, 2004), pp. 602-613
Published by: The MIT Press
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3211650
Page Count: 12
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Labor supply, Net income, Statistical estimation, Wages, Error rates, Covariance, Instrumental variables estimation, Standard error, Estimation bias, Statistical discrepancies
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Most panel data studies of intertemporal labor supply assume classical measurement error. Recent validation studies refute this assumption. In this study I address nonclassical measurement error explicitly. I use data on males from the Panel Study of Income Dynamics Validation Study to purge measurement error from the Panel Study of Income Dynamics. I find a large amount of predictable wage variation in the data, even after allowing for measurement error. However, there is almost no labor supply response to these predictable wage changes. Therefore, failure to control for nonclassical measurement error cannot explain the low estimated labor supply elasticities in other papers.
The Review of Economics and Statistics © 2004 The MIT Press