You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Sample Selection in the Estimation of Air Bag and Seat Belt Effectiveness
Steven D. Levitt and Jack Porter
The Review of Economics and Statistics
Vol. 83, No. 4 (Nov., 2001), pp. 603-615
Published by: The MIT Press
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3211756
Page Count: 13
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Air bags, Seat belts, Automobiles, Sampling methods, Safety devices, Death, Datasets, Trucks, Passengers, Vehicles
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Because data are collected for only fatal crashes, it is difficult to accurately measure seat belt and air bag effectiveness. The use of safety devices influences survival rates which in turn determine whether a crash is included in the sample, leading to sample selection bias. We propose a simple solution to the selection problem: limiting the sample to crashes in which someone in a different vehicle dies. Empirically, we find seat belts more effective and air bags to be less effective than previously found. The cost per life saved through seat belts is approximately $30,000, compared to $1.8 million for air bags.
The Review of Economics and Statistics © 2001 The MIT Press