You are not currently logged in.
Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Review: Sentential Complementation in Akkadian
Reviewed Work: Syntactic Change in Akkadian: The Evolution of Sentential Complementation by Guy Deutscher
Review by: Eran Cohen
Journal of the American Oriental Society
Vol. 122, No. 4 (Oct. - Dec., 2002), pp. 803-806
Published by: American Oriental Society
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3217619
Page Count: 4
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.Note: This article is a review of another work, such as a book, film, musical composition, etc. The original work is not included in the purchase of this review.
Preview not available
The issue of syntax, including diachronic syntax, is considerably more complex than the description of morphological or phonological systems. Large parts of the syntax of various Semitic languages in general and of Akkadian in particular need to be examined and described. G. Deutscher's Syntactic Change in Akkadian: The Evolution of Sentential Complementation is a serious attempt to give Akkadian a profound examination in an exemplary domain of the syntax of any language: sentential complementation and its concurrent strategies. The issue is scrutinized both from the inside, by evaluating the Akkadian material and drawing conclusions therefrom, and from the outside, by comparing the evolution attested along the historical path of the language to other languages. One of the virtues of this book is that, although it is meant to be a diachronic description, it provides synchronic facts, some for the first time, as the point of departure for its diachronic examination. In this review the results of the book are checked against both the linguistic facts and their possible interpretations. This is done in a few sub-categories: complementation, transitivity, the quotative construction, manipulation, and the adaptive process.
Journal of the American Oriental Society © 2002 American Oriental Society