Access

You are not currently logged in.

Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:

login

Log in to your personal account or through your institution.

The "Balance of Injury" as a Reason for Refusing an Injunction to Restrain a Nuisance

University of Pennsylvania Law Review and American Law Register
Vol. 57, No. 6, Volume 48 New Series (Mar., 1909), pp. 396-398
DOI: 10.2307/3313839
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3313839
Page Count: 3
  • Download PDF
  • Add to My Lists
  • Cite this Item
We're having trouble loading this content. Download PDF instead.

Page Thumbnails

Notes and References

This item contains 12 references.

[Footnotes]
  • 1
    164 Fed. 927 (C. C. A., gth Circ.). (396)
  • 2
    This reference contains 3 citations:
    • Evans v. Fertilizing Co., I6o Pa. 209, 224
    • Sellers v. Parvis, 30 Fed. I64
    • Milling Co. v. Tenn. Coal Co., 123 Fed. 8ii.
  • 3
    Kerr on Inj.,* I66; I High on Inj., sec. 739.
  • 4
    This reference contains 2 citations:
    • Gilbert v. Showerman, 23 Mich. 448.
    • see Sanderson v. Coal Co., II3 Pa. I26.
  • 5
    Webb v. Portland Manuf. Co., 3 Summ. I89.
  • 6
    Smith v. Rochester, 45 N. Y. 6I2.
  • 7
    This reference contains 2 citations:
    • Clifton Iron Co. v. Dye, 87 Ala. 468
    • Doughty v. Warren, 85 N. C. 138; Mountain Copper Co., v. U. S., 142 Fed.
  • 8
    This reference contains 2 citations:
    • Richard's Appeal, 57 Pa. I05
    • Sinmpson v. Justice, 8 Ired. Eq. i2o.
  • 9
    Pomeroy, Eq. Jur., vol. 5, par. 530, 531.
  • 10
    Ibid, note 115 and 116.
  • 11
    This reference contains 2 citations:
    • Webb v. Portland Manuf. Co., 3 Summ. I89
    • Snith v. Rochester, 45 N. Y. 6I2.
  • 12
    Weston Co. v. Pope, I55 Ind. 394.