You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Competitive Relations between Sympatric Populations of Voles (Microtus montanus and M. pennsylvanicus)
Robert E. Stoecker
Journal of Animal Ecology
Vol. 41, No. 2 (Jun., 1972), pp. 311-329
Published by: British Ecological Society
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3471
Page Count: 19
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Voles, Habitats, Female animals, Habitat preferences, Soil water, Experimentation, Species, Vegetation, Meadows, Tunnels
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
(1) Competitive interactions between sympatric populations of Microtus montanus and M. pennsylvanicus were studied in the field and in the laboratory by use of simulated natural conditions. Data were gathered over four years (1966-1969). (2) In the field, competition for space among reproductive females was indicated by the non-overlapping nature of home ranges. These data also support the possibility of intra- as well as inter-specific territoriality. In 1966 and 1968 the relative abundance of M. montanus to M. pennsylvanicus was approximately 50: 50; in 1969 it changed to 10: 90. This asynchronous trend in cycling was accompanied by a shift in habitat occurrence: M. montanus no longer utilized the wetter sites, and M. pennsylvanicus expanded their range to include the drier sites; M. pennsylvanicus probably obtained a competitive advantage arising through their numerical superiority. Removal of one species and the subsequent influx of the other suggests that inter-specific behavioural interactions are important in maintaining local habitat segregation. (3) In the laboratory, M. montanus was dominant to M. pennsylvanicus. Inter-specific aggression was more intense than intra-specific aggression. The least aggression occurred intra-specifically among M. pennsylvanicus. Males and females did not differ in their aggressiveness. Simulated habitat segregation was elicited by agonistic interactions: M. pennsylvanicus was excluded from a chamber containing dry Poa sod and restricted to a chamber containing wet Carex sod.
Journal of Animal Ecology © 1972 British Ecological Society