Access

You are not currently logged in.

Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:

login

Log in to your personal account or through your institution.

California Legislation of 1921 Providing for Declaratory Relief

Maurice E. Harrison
California Law Review
Vol. 9, No. 5 (Jul., 1921), pp. 359-373
DOI: 10.2307/3473641
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3473641
Page Count: 15
Subjects: Law
Find more content in these subjects: Law
  • Download PDF
  • Add to My Lists
  • Cite this Item
We're having trouble loading this content. Download PDF instead.

Notes and References

This item contains 38 references.

[Footnotes]
  • 1
    Fitzherbert, New Natura Brevium, 133, Hale's notes, 310.
  • 2
    This reference contains 4 citations:
    • Statham's Abridgment (Klingelsmith's translation) 849
    • Fitzherbert, Natura Brevium, 77
    • Hale's notes, 179
    • Glanville (Beames' translation) Book V, ch. 4
  • 3
    This reference contains 4 citations:
    • Stats. 15
    • 16 Vict. ch. 80, 86, 87
    • Stats. 13
    • 14 Vict. ch. 35
  • 4
    Cox v. Barker (1876), L. R. 3 Ch. Div. 359
  • 5
    7 Statutory Rules and Orders 51.
  • 6
    Guaranty Trust Co. v. Hannay & Co. [1915] 2 K. B. 536.
  • 7
    Central India Mining Co. v. Société Coloniale Anversoise [1920] 1 K. B. 753.
  • 8
    This reference contains 3 citations:
    • 28 Yale Law Journal, 1, 105
    • 16 Michigan Law Review, 69
    • 34 Harvard Law Review, 698
  • 9
    Borchard "The Uniform Act on Declaratory Judgments," 34 Har- vard Law Review, 697
  • 10
    This reference contains 2 citations:
    • King v. Hall (1855) 5 Cal. 83
    • California Law Review, 133.
  • 11
    Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 738.
  • 12
    Cal. Civ. Code, §§ 78, 80.
  • 13
    Cal. Pol. Code, § 3480.
  • 14
    Cal. Stats. 1921, ch. 364.
  • 15
    Lamus v. Engwicht (1919) 39 Cal. App. 523, 179 Pac. 435.
  • 16
    Cal. Stats. 1921, ch. 136.
  • 17
    Sharon v. Sharon (1885) 67 Cal. 185, 7 Pac. 456.
  • 18
    Robinson v. Kerrigan (1907) 151 Cal. 40, 90 Pac. 129, 121 Am. St. Rep. 90.
  • 19
    In re Clay [1919] 1 Ch. 66.
  • 20
    Supra, n. 6.
  • 21
    King v. Hall, supra, n. 10.
  • 22
    Elliott Steam Tug Co. Ltd. v. John Payne & Co. (1920) 25 Com. Cas. 208.
  • 23
    Rex v, Cheshire County Court Judge [1921] 1 K. B. 301.
  • 24
    Smeeton v. Attorney General [1920] 1 Ch. 85 and cases cited.
  • 25
    Burr v. Maclay Co. (1908) 154 Cal. 428, 98 Pac. 260.
  • 26
    Dott's Lease [1920] 1 Ch. 281.
  • 27
    Meyrick's Settlement [1921] 1 Ch. 311.
  • 28
    Simmonds v. Newport Co. [1921] 1 K. B. 616.
  • 29
    Anglo-French Music Co. v. Nicoll [1921] 1 Ch. 386
  • 30
    This reference contains 2 citations:
    • Professor Borchard, 34 Harvard Law Review 704, 707
    • New York Practice Act, § 473
  • 31
    Thomas v. Moore [1918] 1 K. B. 555.
  • 32
    This reference contains 2 citations:
    • Northeastern Co. v. Leeds Forge Co. [1906] 1 Ch. 324.
    • U. S. Rev. Stats. § 4918.
  • 33
    Grand Junction Waterworks v. Hampton Urban Council [1898] 2 Ch. 331.
  • 34
    Markwalk v. Attorney General [1920] 1 Ch. 348.
  • 35
    Simmonds v. Newport Co., supra, n. 27.
  • 36
    Anway v. Grand Rapids R. Co. (1920) 179 N. W. 350 (Mich.).
  • 37
    Cal. Const., Art. III, sec. 1.
  • 38
    This reference contains 4 citations:
    • Robinson v. Kerrigan, supra, n. 18
    • Hoffman v. Superior Court (1907) 151 Cal. 386, 90 Pac. 939
    • Title Restoration Co. v. Kerrigan (1906) 150 Cal. 289, 88 Pac. 356
    • People v. Linda Vista Irrigation District (1900) 128 Cal. 477, 61 Pac. 86