Access

You are not currently logged in.

Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:

login

Log in to your personal account or through your institution.

Constitutional Law: Act to Regulate Commerce: Construction and Validity of Amended Long-and-Short-Haul Clause (Fourth Section)

A. P. M.
California Law Review
Vol. 2, No. 6 (Sep., 1914), pp. 491-494
DOI: 10.2307/3473920
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3473920
Page Count: 4
Subjects: Law
Find more content in these subjects: Law
  • Download PDF
  • Add to My Lists
  • Cite this Item
We're having trouble loading this content. Download PDF instead.

Notes and References

This item contains 16 references.

[Footnotes]
  • 1
    36 Stat. at L. 547, 1911 U. S. Comp. Stat. Supp. 1288.
  • 2
    (June 22, 1914), 234 U. S. 476, 34 Sup. Ct. Rep. 986.
  • 3
    This reference contains 2 citations:
    • R. R. Comrn. of Nevada v. S. P. Co. (1911), 21 I. C. C. 329
    • City of Spokane v. Northern Pac. Ry. Co. (1911), 21 I. C. C. 400.
  • 4
    This reference contains 2 citations:
    • 8 and 9 Vict. Cap. 20, § 90
    • 3 Boyle & Waghorn, pp. 148, 179.
  • 5
    This reference contains 2 citations:
    • 17 and 18 Vict. Cap. 31, § 2
    • 3 Boyle & Waghorn, p. 202.
  • 6
    This reference contains 2 citations:
    • McDonald v. Hovey (1884), 110 U. S. 619, 28 L. Ed. 269, 4 Sup. Ct. Rep. 142
    • I. C. C. v. B. & O. R. R. Co. (1892), 145 U. S. 263, 36 L. Ed. 699, 12 Sup. Ct. Rep. 844.
  • 7
    This reference contains 2 citations:
    • I. C. C. v. B. & O. R. R. Co., supra
    • T. & P. Ry. Co. v. I. C. C. (1896), 162 U. S. 197, 40 L. Ed. 940, 16 Sup. Ct. Rep. 666.
  • 8
    I. C. C. v. Alabama Midland Ry. Co. (1897), 168 U. S. 144, 42 L. Ed. 414, 18 Sup. Ct. Rep. 45.
  • 9
    E. T. V. & G. Ry. Co. v. I. C. C. (1901), 181 U. S. 1, 45 L. Ed. 719, 21 Sup. Ct. Rep. 516.
  • 10
    This reference contains 2 citations:
    • I. C. C. v. Alabama Midland Ry. Co., supra
    • L. & N. R. R. Co. v. Behlmer, 175 U. S. 648, 44 L. Ed. 309, 20 Sup. Ct. Rep. 209.
  • 11
    E. T. V. & G. Ry. Co. v. I. C. C., supra, 45.
  • 12
    This reference contains 4 citations:
    • I. C. C. v. Alabama Midland Ry. Co., supra
    • E. T. V. & G. Ry. Co. v. I. C. C. supra. This view was in conformity with the initial holding of the Interstate Commerce Commission (In re Louisville & Nashville R. R. Co. (1887), 1 I. C. C. 31, I. C R. 278)
    • R. R. Comn. of Ga. v. Clyde S. S. Co. (1892), 5 I. C. C. 324, 4 I. C. R. 120.
    • E. T. V. & G. Ry. Co. v. I. C. C., supra.
  • 13
    This reference contains 3 citations:
    • R. R. Com. of Nevada v. S. P. Co., supra
    • City of Spokane v. Northern Pac. Ry. Co., supra
    • Maricopa County Com. Club v. Santa Fe, Prescott & Phoenix Ry. Co. (1911), 21 I. C. C. 329.
  • 14
    Ibid.
  • 15
    A. T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. U. S. (1911), 191 Fed. 856.
  • 16
    (1902), 183 U S. 503, 46 L. Ed. 298, 22 Sup. Ct. Rep. 95.